Feb 25, 2015
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Hopkins v Kay may have paved the way for private plaintiffs to bring class actions on the basis of tortious claims for breach of privacy within the health sector and potentially in other regulated industries. The Court of Appeal refused to strike a claim for a class action based on the recent tort of intrusion upon seclusion. The Court noted that the relevant privacy legislation, the Personal Health Information Protection Act, is not an exhaustive code and therefore does not preclude tort claims. As such, a claim for intrusion upon seclusion arising in conjunction with the applicable privacy legislation was not bound to fail. Though it remains to be seen whether the claims in Hopkins v Kay will be certified, the decision appears to open the door for the class actions bar to pursue collective claims of relief for significant aggregate claims of damage against organizations in the health care sector. The decision also suggests that private plaintiffs might be able to pursue class proceedings for privacy breaches in other provinces that have comprehensive privacy statutes, as well in regulated sectors and industries where the legislature has created a separate regulatory and enforcement regime. For an in depth discussion of the case, see our Osler Update.
Partner, National Chair, Litigation
October 2017September 2017August 2017July 2017June 2017May 2017April 2017March 2017February 2017January 2017December 2016November 2016October 2016September 2016August 2016July 2016June 2016May 2016April 2016March 2016February 2016January 2016December 2015November 2015October 2015September 2015August 2015July 2015June 2015May 2015April 2015March 2015February 2015January 2015December 2014November 2014October 2014September 2014August 2014July 2014June 2014May 2014April 2014March 2014February 2014January 2014December 2013November 2013October 2013September 2013August 2013July 2013