Shareholder Activism

Close-up of two people’s hands reviewing graphs and information on clipboard.

Shareholders are more engaged than ever. They are critically evaluating the financial and operational performance, governance and sustainability practices of the companies in which they invest and leveraging their rights as shareholders to express their views forcefully, whether privately or in public.  

At Osler we understand both the increased pressure on companies and shareholder frustration when dealing with an intransigent board and management. We have represented some of Canada’s largest companies in defending against activism, but have also advised prominent activists and investment mangers on initiating or responding to activist initiatives.

We are not motivated to seek media attention or to push our clients into public proxy contests. We leverage our deep understanding of the regulatory arena in which shareholder disputes occur and the options available to both sides to advise our client on the most effective strategy to achieve their goal. And when necessary, we do not hesitate to leverage all legal options on our client’s behalf.

Addressing activist shareholder initiatives

Sophisticated companies take a proactive approach by “thinking like an activist.” Osler has worked with a broad range of public Canadian companies to provide strategic guidance on assessing areas of potential vulnerability, preparing for an activist approach, avoiding becoming an activist target and defeating activist initiatives. We help our company clients respond to all forms of shareholder activism, whether that is a contest for control, opposition to a transaction or defending the company’s approach to sustainability.

Our lawyers advise companies on addressing activist threats in an effective and disciplined manner, consistent with directors’ fiduciary duties and, whenever possible, with a view to reducing the risk of incurring the expense and distraction of a public proxy battle. When a dispute is unavoidable, we help companies tailor their strategies in a way that credibly speaks to the broader picture.

Initiating an activist campaign

Osler has advised prominent shareholder activists on some of the most significant initiatives involving Canadian public companies. Leveraging our understanding of our clients’ goals as shareholders, the tools available to them and the legal defences Canadian companies use in response to activists’ initiatives, our experts offer activist shareholders strategic advice on how to prepare, initiate and announce an activist approach to a target and achieve their objectives. We also provide guidance on required regulatory approvals, filings and other compliance matters when taking action.

Industry Recognition

Osler’s Shareholder Activist Group has been recognized as an industry leader. The most recent edition of Corporate Commercial: The Elite (Chambers Canada, 2024), includes the following recommendation: “The lawyers at Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt are very practical, thoughtful, timely and proactive. They provide fit-for-purpose advice and work product."

Download

Andrew MacDougall

Partner, Corporate

Toronto

  • Corus Entertainment Inc.

    Corus Entertainment Inc. in connection with its $2.65 billion purchase of Shaw Media Inc. from Shaw Communications Inc.

  • Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Legacy Oil + Gas Inc.

    Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Legacy Oil + Gas Inc. in connection with activist shareholder matters and Legacy’s $1.5 billion acquisition by Crescent Point Energy Corp.

  • Access Holdings

    Access Holdings in its proxy battle with Tuckamore Capital.

  • Tocqueville Asset Management

    Tocqueville Asset Management in seeking changes to the board of Scorpio Mining Corporation.

  • TELUS Corp.

    TELUS Corporation in connection with its successful move from a dual class share structure to a single class of outstanding common shares, and related proxy fights with Mason Capital Management LLC.

  • Miranda Technologies Inc.

    Miranda Technologies Inc. in connection with its strategic review process, culminating in Belden Inc.’s $375 million acquisition of Miranda by way of a take-over bid, as well as in connection with its dissident shareholder JEC Capital Partners, LLC’s unsuccessful attempt to requisition a shareholder meeting to appoint new directors to Miranda’s Board.

  • Concerned Shareholders of Helix BioPharma Inc.

    Concerned Shareholders of Helix BioPharma Inc. in their investment in Helix Biopharma,

  • Smoothwater Capital

    Smoothwater Capital in its proxy contest with Genesis Land Development Corp. and in the ultimate settlement of that contest.

  • KingSett Capital

    KingSett Capital in the negotiated resolution of the proxy contest involving InnVest REIT.

  • Icahn Associates Corp.

    Icahn Associates Corp. in its unsolicited tender offers for Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. and related proxy Contests

  • Find More