FAQs concerning the Investment Canada Act
The following are some frequently asked questions (FAQs) concerning the application, administration and enforcement of the Investment Canada Act. These FAQs and responses are of a general nature, and cannot be regarded as legal advice.
- When does the Investment Canada Act apply?
- What are the thresholds for review?
(a) Financial Threshold
(b) Acquisition of Control Threshold
- What are the implications of the enterprise value threshold for investment reviews?
- Are there any exemptions from filing under the Investment Canada Act?
- If a transaction does not meet thresholds for review, is the investor required to obtain any kind of clearance, or take any action?
- Do specific considerations apply to investments involving a cultural business?
- What is considered a “cultural business”?
- Are there any other sensitive sectors besides culture?
- Can investors implement a proposed investment pending approval?
- When will the investor receive approval of a reviewable investment?
- What does “net benefit” mean?
- How many investments have not been approved?
- What happens once the Minister approves an investment?
- Does the Minister publicly disclose an investor’s undertakings?
- What considerations apply to an acquisition of control by a state-owned enterprise (SOE)?
- How many SOE investments have been approved?
- Which investments are subject to a national security review?
- What does “national security” mean?
- How do investors receive national security clearance?
- If a national security review has been ordered and referred to the Governor in Council, what measures may the Governor in Council take?
- What has been the experience so far with national security reviews?
- How does the Investment Canada Act review process relate to the Competition Act review process?
When does the Investment Canada Act apply?
The Investment Canada Act (ICA) applies when a “non-Canadian” (e.g., an “entity” that is not Canadian-controlled):
- establishes a new business in Canada, or
- proposes to acquire control -- directly or indirectly -- of an existing Canadian business.
“Canadian business” is defined in the ICA as a business carried on in Canada that has:
- a place of business in Canada,
- an individual or individuals in Canada who are employed or self-employed in connection with the business, and
- assets in Canada used in carrying on the business.
Note that the ICA applies even if the Canadian business being acquired is not Canadian-controlled.
Direct investments, where the enterprise value or the book value of the Canadian business exceeds prescribed monetary thresholds, or those raising national security concerns, are subject to government approval. Except for certain cultural transactions and those raising national security concerns, all other acquisitions of control and establishments of new Canadian businesses are subject to a notification process only.
What are the thresholds for review?
A direct acquisition by a non-Canadian that is controlled by nationals of a World Trade Organization (WTO) member state to acquire control of a Canadian business, or a sale of a Canadian business when it is controlled by a WTO investor, is only reviewable on a pre-closing basis by the Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development if the enterprise value of the Canadian business exceeds $1 billion.
The case of a direct acquisition must be distinguished from that of an indirect acquisition. In an indirect acquisition, the investor acquires shares of a non-Canadian corporation, which in turn owns shares in a Canadian corporation. An indirect investment by a WTO investor, or a sale by a WTO investor, is not reviewable either on a pre-closing or a post-closing basis, except if the Canadian business is a “cultural business” or raises a national security issue.
Enterprise value is calculated differently, depending on whether the Canadian business is a publicly traded or privately held entity, or consists of assets.
Direct acquisition of a publicly traded entity – the publicly traded entity must have $1 billion or more in enterprise value, based on its market capitalization, plus its total liabilities excluding its operating liabilities and minus its cash and cash equivalents.
- Market capitalization is calculated by using the average daily closing price of the target’s quoted equity securities on the entity’s principal market (i.e., where the greatest volume of trading occurred during the trading period) over the most recent 20 days of trading ending before the first day of the month that immediately precedes the month in which the application for review or notification is filed.
- If there are unlisted equity securities, the fair market value of such securities, as determined by the board of directors of the investor or other person authorized to make that determination, is included.
- Total liabilities, excluding operating liabilities, cash and cash equivalents are determined based on the most recent quarterly financial statements.
Direct acquisition of a privately held entity –the privately held entity must have $1 billion or more in enterprise value, based on the total acquisition value, plus its total liabilities excluding its operating liabilities and minus its cash and cash equivalents.
- Where the investor is acquiring 100% of the voting interests, total acquisition value is the total consideration payable. Where the investor is acquiring less than 100% of the voting interests, total acquisition value is the aggregate of the consideration payable by the investor, the consideration payable by any other investors, and the fair market value determined by the investor of any portion of the voting interests that is not being acquired.
- In circumstances where the parties are non-arm’s length, or consideration is nominal or zero, total consideration payable is fair market value.
- Total liabilities, excluding operating liabilities, cash and cash equivalents are determined based on the most recent quarterly financial statements.
Acquisition of assets – the assets must have $1 billion or more in enterprise value, based on the total consideration payable, plus the liabilities that are assumed by the investor (other than operating liabilities), and minus the cash and cash equivalents that are transferred to the investor.
- In circumstances where the parties are non-arm’s length, or consideration is nominal or zero, total consideration payable is fair market value.
Direct acquisition by a state-owned enterprise (SOE) investor – the applicable threshold is book value of assets of the Canadian business is $379 million or more (in 2016; this amount is indexed annually).
Acquisition of Control Threshold
An investment by a non-Canadian must involve an acquisition of control in order for the ICA to apply. An acquisition of control is presumed to occur if a non-Canadian acquires one-third or more of the voting shares of a corporation, and is deemed to occur if a non-Canadian acquires a majority of the voting shares of a corporation or a majority of the voting interests of a partnership, trust or joint venture.
An acquisition of less than one-third of the voting shares of a corporation, or less than a majority of the voting interests of a partnership, trust or joint venture, is deemed not to be an acquisition of control (except in cases involving a cultural business or an SOE investor, where a control in fact test applies).
What are the implications of the enterprise value threshold for investment reviews?
The enterprise value threshold has several implications:
- For public bids, there is an element of strategy in deciding when to make an ICA filing. The time period for calculating the share price for market capitalization is determined when an ICA filing is made. It is possible that the first bidder may file a notification based on an enterprise value which is below the threshold (i.e., no ICA review would be required for that bidder). If the announcement of this first bid has the effect of increasing the target’s share price, this has the potential to result in an uneven playing field amongst foreign bidders. While the first bidder would not be subject to ICA review, if there is a significant time gap in between bids such that enterprise value must be re-calculated to take into account the impact on share price as a result of the first offer, subsequent bidders may be subject to ICA review if the enterprise value has increased above the threshold.
- SOE and private sector investors are subject to different thresholds. As a result, it is possible that a private sector investor may trigger a review as a result of the target’s enterprise value exceeding the $1 billion threshold, while that same investment by an SOE would not trigger a review if the book value of the target’s assets is below the $379 million asset value threshold. The converse may also occur, i.e. a private sector investor may not be subject to review if the enterprise value of the target is below $1 billion, while an SOE may be subject to review because the book value of the target exceeds $379 million.
- Consideration payable and fair market value determinations in acquisitions of privately-held entities and assets have ICA filing implications.
Are there any exemptions from filing under the Investment Canada Act?
The ICA exempts several types of transactions, for example:
- an acquisition of control of a branch business,
- an acquisition of control in connection with the realization of security granted for a loan or other financial assistance and not for any purpose related to the ICA,
- a corporate reorganization following which the ultimate control of the Canadian business remains unchanged, and
- certain acquisitions of control or establishments of new Canadian businesses where the investor is a foreign bank or is associated with a foreign bank.
If a transaction does not meet thresholds for review, is the investor required to obtain any kind of clearance, or take any action?
If a direct or indirect investment by a non-Canadian does not meet the review thresholds set out above, the investor must file a notification with the Investment Review Division (IRD). A notification must be filed at any time prior to the implementation of the investment or within 30 days after its implementation. Non-Canadians who establish a new Canadian business also must file a notification.
Do specific considerations apply to investments involving a cultural business?
Review thresholds for acquisitions of control of a Canadian cultural business are $5 million in book value of assets of the business for direct investments and $50 million in book value of assets of the business for indirect investments. For an indirect acquisition of a cultural business, where the value of the worldwide assets of the Canadian business exceeds 50% of the value of all assets acquired, the review threshold is $5 million in book value of assets.
Unlike non-cultural businesses, indirect investments in the cultural sector are reviewable on a post-closing basis. If the assets of the cultural business fall below the thresholds for review, the Governor in Council (i.e., the federal Cabinet) may still order a review on a discretionary basis. Cultural investments are reviewed by the Department of Canadian Heritage.
What is considered a “cultural business”?
“Cultural business” is defined in the ICA. A cultural business is a business that carries on any of the following:
- the publication, distribution or sale of books, magazines, periodicals or newspapers in print or in machine readable form (but excludes businesses involved only in the printing or typesetting of these items);
- the production, distribution, sale or exhibition of film or video recordings;
- the production, distribution, sale or exhibition of audio or video music recordings;
- the publication, distribution or sale of music in print or machine readable form; or
- any business activities involving radio communication intended for direct reception by the general public, any radio, television and cable television broadcasting undertakings and any satellite programming and broadcast network services.
Notably, there are special policies which prevent or restrict investments in the film distribution, and book publishing and distribution sectors. However, the government has been adopting a more flexible and pragmatic approach to enforcement of these policies. For example, in 2010, Amazon.com was permitted to establish a Canadian fulfillment centre and Apple Canada was granted approval to establish iBookstore Canada, in return for certain commitments to strengthen the Canadian book sector. In 2012, Target received approval to sell cultural products, including books, when it launched its stores in Canada. In 2014, the Department of Canadian Heritage approved Torstar Corporation’s sale of the Harlequin book business to HarperCollins Publishers, a subsidiary of News Corp. (a transaction which on its face was prohibited by the book policy).
Are there any other sensitive sectors besides culture?
Until 2009, the lower review thresholds which still apply to acquisitions of control of cultural businesses also applied to acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses involved in financial services, transportation services, and uranium production. These industries are no longer subject to these lower thresholds. In addition to specific sectoral review legislation, however, acquisitions in these sectors may be subject to national security review in the same way as all other sectors of the economy.
With respect to national security, based on the limited experience to date, certain sectors may be more likely to attract scrutiny, including aerospace, defence, network and data security, telecommunications and sensitive technology.
Investors may also encounter provincial government concerns during an ICA review, such as during the attempted 2010 acquisition of Potash Corp. by BHP Billiton (Saskatchewan) and the 2012 offer by Lowe’s to acquire Rona (Quebec).
Can investors implement a proposed investment pending approval?
Generally, the direct acquisition of a Canadian business cannot be implemented until the Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development (or Minister of Canadian Heritage for cultural transactions) “is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada”. In a global transaction, where the Canadian business is being acquired directly, and there is no obstacle to closing outside of Canada, it may be necessary on closing to “carve out” the Canadian portion of the acquired business until the transaction is approved by the Minister.
Indirect transactions involving WTO investors or sellers are not reviewable. Indirect cultural transactions may be implemented without obtaining pre-closing approval.
When will the investor receive approval of a reviewable investment?
Investors must file an application for review with the IRD prior to implementation of the investment, and allow sufficient time for review by the IRD and the Minister’s office before closing. The Minister has up to 45 calendar days (which he/she may extend by an additional period of 30 calendar days) to determine whether the investment should be approved. The review period may be extended past 75 days for an additional period which is determined by agreement between the IRD and the investor. It is prudent to allow at least 75 days for approval. The average review time from April 1, 2014, to March 31, 2015 was 75.3 days.
What does “net benefit” mean?
Net benefit is not defined in the ICA. However, the Minister will consider the following factors set out in the ICA to determine whether an investment is likely to be of “net benefit”:
- effect of the investment on the level of economic activity in Canada, on employment, on resource processing, on the utilization of parts, components and services produced in Canada and on exports from Canada;
- degree and significance of participation by Canadians in the Canadian business;
- effect of the investment on productivity, industrial efficiency, technological development, product innovation, and product variety in Canada;
- effect of the investment on competition within any industry in Canada;
- compatibility of the investment with national industrial, economic and cultural policies (taking into consideration provincial policy objectives); and
- contribution of the investment to Canada’s ability to compete in world markets.
In practice, this means that the investor will have to set out in its application for review projections for Canadian employment, capital expenditures in Canada, Canadian management participation and responsibilities for the business, R&D activity in Canada, production in Canada and exports, and other relevant information. Foreign investments in cultural businesses must take into account the goal of the Department of Canadian Heritage to promote Canadian content across various forms of media. In addition, the investor typically – though not always – must submit binding undertakings to the Minister confirming its commitment to perform the key elements of these plans. Undertakings apply over a three year period after closing (five years for a cultural investment).
How many investments have not been approved?
Between June 30, 1985 and March 31, 2015, the Minister reviewed and approved 1,703 investments. During this period, only a handful of major proposals outside the cultural area were disallowed by the Minister of Industry (e.g., Macdonald Dettwiler and Associates Ltd.’s proposed acquisition by Alliant Techsystems Inc. in May 2008, BHP Billiton plc’s proposed hostile takeover of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan in November 2010 and Accelero Capital Holdings’ proposed acquisition of the Allstream division of Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. in October 2013). Note that these statistics do not reflect proposed investments which were withdrawn before the Minister reached a decision.
What happens once the Minister approves an investment?
After receiving approval and implementing the investment, the investor must comply with its undertakings. The investor is also required to submit a “progress report” to the IRD approximately 12-18 months after closing and every 12-18 months thereafter for the duration of the undertakings, so that the IRD may assess whether the investor is complying with its undertakings.
The Minister is empowered to demand that an investor comply with its undertakings. If an investor fails to comply with a demand issued by the Minister, the Minister may apply to a superior court for an order directing the investor to comply with the undertakings, requiring it to divest itself of the acquired business and imposing a penalty not exceeding $10,000 for each day of contravention. In 2009, for the first time in the history of the ICA, the Minister brought court proceedings in relation to alleged shortcomings in an investor’s undertakings (the U.S. Steel case). In 2011, the Minister reached an out-of-court settlement with U.S. Steel, in return for U.S. Steel’s commitment to significantly enhanced undertakings. Typically, however, an investor will reach an agreed solution with the Minister concerning a failure to fulfill undertakings.
Does the Minister publicly disclose an investor’s undertakings?
Normally, the Minister does not publicly disclose an investor’s undertakings. However, in connection with enforcement proceedings in the U.S. Steel case, certain undertakings were disclosed.
In addition, the IRD may disclose the fact that an application has been filed under the ICA, and at what point the investment is in the review process. Prior to making such a disclosure, the IRD will inform the investor. The IRD will not disclose the information if the investor satisfies the IRD that the disclosure would prejudice the investor.
An investor may voluntarily disclose the general tenor of its proposed undertakings for strategic reasons.
What considerations apply to an acquisition of control by a state-owned enterprise (SOE)?
Investments by SOEs, including sovereign wealth funds, are analysed under the usual “net benefit” factors in the ICA, as well as special guidelines which refer to:
- the nature and extent of control by the foreign government,
- the SOE’s corporate governance, operating and reporting practices,
- the SOE’s adherence to free market principles,
- the effect of the investment on the level and nature of economic activity in Canada, and
- whether the Canadian business will retain the ability to operate on a commercial basis.
In an SOE transaction, the Minister will consider requesting undertakings such as appointing independent Canadian directors, employing Canadians in senior management, incorporating the business in Canada and listing shares of the SOE or the Canadian business on a Canadian stock exchange.
In December 2012, following the Minister’s approval of Malaysian-controlled PETRONAS’ $6-billion acquisition of Progress Energy Resources Corp. and CNOOC’s $15.1-billion acquisition of Nexen Inc., the Canadian government announced it was taking a more restrictive approach to reviewing investments in Canada by SOEs. Although the government stated that it continues to welcome and encourage foreign investment in Canada, it indicated a clear preference for private foreign investment over investment by SOEs, minority SOE investments over acquisitions of control by SOEs, and a lower tolerance for SOEs acquiring control of, or material influence over, leading firms in any sectors of Canada’s economy. Further, the government stated that acquisitions of control in the Canadian oil sands by SOEs will only be permitted in “exceptional” circumstances.
In 2013, the ICA was amended to introduce an expanded definition of SOE to include individuals acting under the direction of a foreign government and individuals and entities directly or indirectly influenced by a foreign government. The Minister may determine whether an entity is controlled in fact by a SOE or whether there has been an acquisition of control by a SOE, or that an otherwise Canadian-controlled entity is controlled in fact by a SOE.
How many SOE investments have been approved?
Prior to the government’s December 2012 announcements, numerous acquisitions of control by SOEs had been approved. Although the pace of SOE investment slowed considerably following the December 2012 announcements, SOEs continue to make significant investments in Canada. For example, in March 2014, Talisman Energy sold Montney acreage to Progress Energy for $1.5 billion. In April 2014, Thai SOE PTTEP secured approval from the Minister to acquire the remaining 60% interest (that it did not already own) in the Thornbury, Hangingstone and South Leismer areas in the Alberta oil sands from Statoil, a Norwegian SOE. In October 2014, Chevron Corp. announced that it had agreed to sell 30% of its interest in its Duvernay shale operations to a subsidiary of state-run Kuwait Petroleum Corp. for US$1.5 billion.
Acquisitions by SOEs which do not confer control are not reviewed under the SOE guidelines, but may be subject to review under the national security jurisdiction.
Which investments are subject to a national security review?
An investment is subject to national security review if the Minister considers that the investment could be injurious to national security and if the Governor in Council (i.e., the federal Cabinet, on the Minister’s recommendation) makes an order for review. Notably, even establishments of new businesses and investments which do not involve an acquisition of control of a Canadian business may be subject to national security review.
What does “national security” mean?
National security is not defined in the ICA, regulations or guidelines. There are no guidelines which indicate whether investments involving certain industries or certain types of investors are likely to raise concerns in relation to national security. In the absence of Canadian guidance, the annual report of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is a useful resource.
In broad terms, it seems there are two aspects of transactions that may present national security concerns. One aspect is the nature of the business and the interest that is being acquired (e.g., the proposed acquisition of a Canadian business that may possess sensitive technology that is relied upon by the Canadian government for secure communications, or the proposed acquisition of a Canadian business that is located in close proximity to Canadian military facilities). The second aspect is the identity of the investor making an investment (e.g., an investor connected to a country that is subject to Canadian economic sanctions, or an investor that could enable a foreign government to conduct espionage or sabotage of critical infrastructure).
How do investors receive national security clearance?
For an investment involving an establishment of a new Canadian business or an acquisition of control of an existing Canadian business, an investor may obtain comfort on national security issues by submitting the legally required notification or application for review. However, there is no prescribed clearance process for transactions which do not require notification or review, even though such transactions may be subject to review under the ICA on the basis of national security.
The Minister has 45 days after the certified date of a notification or an application for review to notify the investor that an order for national security review may be issued. An investment that is not subject to notification or review may be voluntarily disclosed to the Minister; the Minister may notify the investor up to 45 days after the transaction has closed that an order for national security review may be issued.
Including all of the interim review periods and the final period in which the Governor in Council may take action with respect to the investment, a full national security review may last up to 200 days (or longer, if the investor and the Minister agree to an extension).
If a national security review has been ordered and referred to the Governor in Council, what measures may the Governor in Council take?
The Governor in Council may, by order, take any measures it considers advisable to protect national security. Measures include:
- directing the investor not to implement the investment,
- authorizing the investment on the condition that the investor provide undertakings or implement the investment on specified conditions, or
- requiring divestiture of the investment (if previously completed).
What has been the experience so far with national security reviews?
The following is a summary of some of the publicly disclosed cases which have engaged national security issues. The government does not publish statistics on the number of cases which raise national security issues, or the sectors of concern.
The 2009 acquisition of Macdonald Dettwiler’s information systems business by American company Alliant Techsystems (referenced above) was blocked by the Minister, pursuant to the general net benefit to Canada jurisdiction of the ICA (before the national security jurisdiction was enacted in early 2009). Media reports suggested that the decision was motivated by concern over losing Canadian control of Canadian space technology which contributed to Canadian sovereignty.
In 2010, the Minister of Industry issued a notice to George Forrest International Afrique S.P.R.L. (GFI) that its proposed acquisition of Forsys Metals Corporation could be reviewable on national security grounds. The transaction then terminated. Forsys had a uranium project in Namibia and there was apparently a relationship between GFI and the government of Iran.
In 2013, Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E. (Orascom), a subsidiary of Vimpelcom Ltd. (a company controlled by a Russian investor), announced that it was withdrawing its application under the ICA to acquire control of Globalive Wireless Management Corp. and its subsidiary, Wind Mobile.
A media report in 2013 suggested that in 2012 the Canadian government blocked the proposed sale of Canadian firm PCI Geomatics to the Chinese firm NAVInfo, and that a contemplated sale of BlackBerry Ltd. to Beijing-based computer manufacturer Lenovo Group Ltd. did not proceed because the Canadian government had indicated that it would disallow the transaction on national security grounds.
In 2013, the Canadian government rejected Accelero Capital Holdings’ proposed acquisition of the Allstream division of Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. This was the first expressly disallowed transaction on national security grounds since the creation of the national security regime in 2009. The government’s statement on this decision highlighted Allstream’s operation of a national fibre optic network that provides critical telecommunications services to business and governments, including the Government of Canada.
In 2015, a media report disclosed that a proposed investment by Chinese company Beida Jade Bird to establish an alarm manufacturing facility near to a Canadian Space Agency facility was prohibited. Also in 2015 the government ordered the divestiture of ITF Technologies by Chinese company O-Net. ITF operations include manufacturing and distribution of optical components and modules for the telecom market and producing high-power devices and sub-assemblies for the industrial market. O-Net is challenging in Federal Court the government’s order-in-council demanding that O-Net divest itself of ITF.
How does the Investment Canada Act review process relate to the Competition Act review process?
The ICA review is undertaken separately from the review of a proposed transaction on competition law grounds under the Competition Act (CA). The CA review is undertaken by the Competition Bureau. The Minister may delay the approval of a proposed transaction while the Competition Bureau is reviewing it under the CA. One of the net benefit factors listed in the ICA is the effect of the investment on competition within any industry in Canada. The Minister may also decide to approve a transaction that is still under review by the Bureau.