The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently addressed a novel question of appellate jurisdiction: is an order refusing to extend the time to opt out of a…
Ontario’s new community net metering regulation for pilot projects
A new Ontario regulation is intended to support the gradual expansion of renewable energy net metering to multi-building pilot projects. Osler&rs…
Québec Financial Market Administrative Tribunal’s long reach
A recent decision by the Court of Appeal of Québec demonstrates the long reach of the Financial Markets Administrative Tribunal (the FMAT).
Top five advertising considerations for crypto trading platforms
Last week, CSA and IIROC issued guidance on marketing, advertising and social media standards for crypto trading platforms. In their blog, Osler&rsquo…
Movement towards financial title regulation expands across Canada
Several provinces have begun regulating the titles used by professionals in the financial services industry, but important distinction…
Opportunity knocks: lithium and graphite development in Canada
Global electric vehicle usage is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years in support of the transition to a clean energy environment. Osl…
CSA/IIROC issue marketing and social media guidance for crypto trading platforms
CSA-IIROC Staff publish guidance for crypto-trading platforms outlining requirements for their advertising, marketing and social media use.
Key authorizations required for hydrogen production in Québec
Energy companies are increasingly exploring opportunities in hydrogen for its clean energy potential. Osler’s Alexandre Fallon, Richard Wong, Cr…
Smart building technologies – thinking about data
The increasing use of smart technologies in the construction industry has potential legal implications relating to the collection and use of data. In …
A minefield of risk? Ontario court grants leave and certifies class for secondary market misrepresentation action
A recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision certified a proposed global class after finding the defendant did not sufficiently disclose …
